They Don’t Get It, Do They?

I guess we shouldn’t be surprised that right-wing assholes like Andrew Breitbart and James O’Keefe don’t understand the Occupy Wall Street movement. So let me explain it to them.

Perhaps you’ve heard that Media Matters Senior Fellow Eric Boehlert was targeted at his home by someone pretending to be a Verizon employee. Details at the link but this should bring everyone up to speed:

“So he gets to the last questions, and he’s really reading intently off of his clipboard, and he says something about making the kind of salary I do, working from home, something something about the 99 percenters,” Boehlert said.

The man claiming to be a Verizon representative finally asked his question. “After he mentioned my salary and that I work from home, all the bells went off, and this is not who this guy says he is. Therefore, I kind of lost track of the exact wording of the question, but it definitely was like very accusatory of me and I’m a hypocrite and how do I have this supposedly cushy job while I’m writing about real workers and the people of the 99 percent,” said Boehlert.

We still don’t know who misrepresented themselves to Boehlert — Andrew Breitbart denies involvement — but this has all the classic hallmarks of one of O’Keefe’s “Project Veritas” minions, where “veritas” is not Latin for truth but rather wingnut for misquotes and misrepresentation.

As HuffPost reported, Breitbart accolytes like Mike Flynn have been harassing Boehlert on Twitter with such taunts as….

#ows, @EricBoehlert is cashing 6-figure checks to support you. When u r run out of Zuccotti park, beers and brats at his place in NJ

… “ows” being the hashtag for Occupy Wall Street, of course. And here is what Mike Flynn, Andrew Breitbart, James O’Keefe and the rest don’t seem to get: no one really thinks it’s problem how much money Eric Boehlert earns. No one cares how much money anyone earns, as long as they are paying their share of taxes, helping the guy below them on the success ladder, and not actively working to pull the ladder up behind them so we have a permanent underclass whose only recourse is to work as slaves to the rich.

Amazing that conservative activists don’t seem to understand this. Naw, scratch that. It’s utterly predictable. It also shows how out of touch they are, how phony conservative populism is, but there you go.

Right-wingers love to play the hypocrisy card, as if anyone earning over $50,000 a year has no right to criticize the multimillionaires for their greedy ways or have sympathy for those on welfare. But what the left objects to is greed, oppression, and inequality, not a well-earned salary.

I doubt too many good Lefties are going to begrudge people like Eric Boehlert their six-figure salaries (if that is indeed what Boehlert earns, I have no idea nor is it any of my business). Why? Because he is working on behalf of the 99% to make the system more equitable! He isn’t pulling the ladder up behind him, he’s trying to extend it to those below him on the economic scale. There is no hypocrisy here. What there is, actually, is someone working against their own economic self-interest for the betterment of others.

This is not a difficult concept to grasp, and it’s why conservative claims that no liberal should be allowed to earn any money are so hilarious.

I don’t begrudge Bill Maher or Jon Stewart or Stephen Colbert their millions. In fact, I want more rich liberals out there. That’s more donations to Planned Parenthood and the ACLU and the Sierra Club.

Rich liberals who extend a hand to those below them economically are not hypocrites. They’re altruists. Something we used to value in this country, by the way, until a godless conservative named Ayn Rand convinced some idiots that altruism was a bad thing. Now they’ve drunk so much Kool-Aid they don’t even recognize it when they see it.

About these ads

8 Comments

Filed under Andrew Breitbart, conservative bloggers, conservatives, James O'Keefe, liberals

8 responses to “They Don’t Get It, Do They?

  1. John Weiss

    The reason that humans are successful is – altruism. Cooperation. Good will toward strangers.

    I’ve come to despise the Rand crowd. Shame on me. But I can’t help it. Those folk are anti-life!

  2. deep cap

    Besides isn’t a 6 figure salary still short of the 1%? I thought you had to earn a 7 figure salary to be in that elite group.

    Also, what’s with CNN thinking that if someone *works* for the 1% that somehow makes them the 1%?

    http://www.cnn.com/2011/12/07/us/occupy-wall-street-job/index.html?hpt=hp_bn2

    • Oh GAH that CNN article is so full of fail! Get this:

      She sounds like the protester stereotype, but she isn’t; she has a doctorate in biochemistry.

      Shorter CNN: Look! Someone doesn’t match the stereotype WE created!

      Idiots. Here’s a news flash: A lot of the Occupy Wall Street protesters actually have jobs! They’re protesting before and after work and on weekends.

      Morons.

      • ThresherK

        I can hear the voice of a thousand Kent Brockman wannabees in that article. I half-expected it to include “For those of you too young to remember the 60′s, here’s our stock montage…[scenes of peace rally/Vietnam protest, Nixon, the moon landing, Woodstock]…What a shrill, pointless decade.”

  3. “I guess we shouldn’t be surprised that right-wing assholes like Andrew Breitbart and James O’Keefe don’t understand the Occupy Wall Street movement.”

    They understand it AND it scares the living shit out of the people they suck off to make a living. Breitbart, O’Keefe and the rest are fucking scum who are somewhat less useful than dead cats.

  4. Randy

    “…where “veritas” is not Latin for truth but rather wingnut for misquotes and misrepresentation.” This, my brothers and sisters, is literature.

    All this is Good News.

    Allow me a rant to show my solidarity.

    If I hear “They hate rich people” ONE MORE TIME. ARGHHHHHH!

    I (We) HATE CRIMINALS!

    Carry on.

  5. D.

    Let me be temporarily boring because there’s a point.

    Somehow a copy of an ancient paperback Gothic turned up at the family homestead. I read it over a few days because it kept throwing me out of the story with gales of laughter. Title was House at Hawk’s End, and it is so written to formula that one could practically set a watch by it. (Heroine reveals Painful Secret in Her Past? Must be lunchtime.) It fulfills all of the clichés of the genre.

    The ending, though. Let me quote:

    “The [villains] own Hawk’s End. Every one of the fishermen is in their debt, either through bank loans, mortgages, or grocery credit. They raise prices whenever they feel like it and squeeze the people dry. … Prosperity could wreck their little monopoly.”

    It’s not a new practice, but it’s usually been localized; conservatives are trying to make it national.

    And Mr. Breitbart and Mr. O’Keefe are tools. We know how the 1% treat tools.

  6. Mike G

    “Working for the betterment of others” seems to be a concept right-wing corporatist authoritarians are pathologically incapable of grasping. Selfishness, privilege and tribalism are the core of their worldview.