Jeb Bush: Pro-Iraq War Since 1997

Of course Jeb Bush would have invaded Iraq.

Am I the only one who remembers PNAC? Jeb Bush was one of the original signers of PNAC’s Statement of Principals back in 1997, which declared:

• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;

• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;

• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;

• we need to accept responsibility for America’s unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.

In 1998, these are the geniuses who sent this now-infamous letter to President Clinton advocating regime change in Iraq. They were convinced, as early as January 1998 (in truth, well before), that Saddam Hussein possessed WMDs and would destabilize the Middle East and the West’s access to its precious oil reserves unless he were removed from power. They wrote:

The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.

We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration’s attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam’s regime from power.

This was five years before our invasion of Iraq. They were focused like a laser on one thing and one thing only. The idea that “all of the intelligence agencies got it wrong” is such laughable bullshit. The entire Neocon-chickenhawk foreign policy apparatus behind George W. Bush had an agenda they’d been pushing for years, and that apparatus included his brother, Jeb. There was no “oops, we were given the wrong intel.” It was, “we’ve had this plan in the works for years and now we finally get to implement it!” Any “intel” that was used was cherry-picked to pre-select that which agreed with their agenda so they could justify their actions to the rest of the world.

So please, news media. Stop pretending Jeb just “flubbed a question.” You guys are getting it wrong because once again you’re just focused on the campaign, instead of being focused on the policy. The policy Jeb Bush has always advocated is hard-core Neocon hawkishness, and that is what failed us in Iraq. Not some cherry-picked intelligence.

5 Comments

Filed under 2016 Presidential Election, Iraq War, media

5 responses to “Jeb Bush: Pro-Iraq War Since 1997

  1. Joe

    It has always given me pause that part of the PNAC was a statement that it would take a long time to transform to the military they wanted “absent some
    catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor” which was exactly what the 9/11 attacks provided. At the very least, it has always made me wonder whether the Bush administration chose to ignore the warning signs to bring about this “new Pearl Harbor.”

    • “Why are you saying that ISIS was created by us not having a presence in the Middle East when it’s pointless wars where we send young American men to die for the idea of American exceptionalism?”

      Yes, indeed. The whole “American exceptionalism” thing is straight out of the PNAC statement of principles. Good for her. Jeb Bush will never EVER be able to shake Iraq because it wasn’t something his brother did, it was something HE did, too.

      • Seeker

        “Jeb Bush will never EVER be able to shake Iraq because it wasn’t something his brother did, it was something HE did, too.”

        I stayed up in 2000 watching the election, and I remember quite clearly that Florida was called for Al Gore. How convenient that the state Jeb Bush was Governor of, went for George Bush because of shenanigans in the voting booth.